Safety findings

Human evidence reviewAbstract inspected

A 2026 systematic review of 41 studies on 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors in androgenetic/male- or female-pattern hair loss found sexual adverse events reported in 1.9-6.7% of men on oral finasteride 1 mg versus 0.9-3.9% on placebo, and in 4.1-12.0% of men on dutasteride 0.5 mg versus 4.0-5.0% on placebo, with most events described as mild and reversible after stopping treatment; no consistent sexual adverse effects were reported in women treated for hair loss.[2]

  • Abstract-checked; individual per-study data behind the 41-study synthesis were not independently re-verified in this batch.
  • Reported ranges span multiple trials of differing design and duration in an androgenetic-alopecia population; they are not a single pooled point estimate and do not quantify risk in anabolic-androgenic-steroid users.
  • "Mild and reversible" reflects reporting in the synthesized trials as characterized by this review's authors, not an independent adjudication in this dossier. No qualified clinical review.
Inspection history

Clinical review: not reviewed by a qualified clinician.

· New claim added 2026-09-09 from a source located during fresh research on the finasteride-outcomes-28 and dutasteride-endocrine-24 claims; adds a sexual-dysfunction-specific safety synthesis distinct from the existing hair-outcome and semen/DHT-endocrine claims.

Human observational studyAbstract inspected

A 2026 pharmacovigilance disproportionality study using FAERS and EudraVigilance spontaneous adverse-event reports (2002-2025) identified finasteride among 19 cross-validated high-risk drugs for male infertility signals, and reported that finasteride specifically satisfied both dechallenge and rechallenge criteria in this database analysis, which the authors describe as strong evidence for causality within this study design. Dutasteride and testosterone were also named among the 19 high-risk drugs, without the same dechallenge/rechallenge detail reported in the abstract.[3]

  • Passive spontaneous-reporting pharmacovigilance databases generate disproportionality signals, not confirmed incidence rates or a validated causal mechanism beyond the dechallenge/rechallenge criterion reported for finasteride.
  • Abstract-checked only; the underlying per-case data supporting the dechallenge/rechallenge finding were not independently inspected in this batch.
  • A reporting-database signal is not proof of a specific individual risk and does not by itself establish an incidence rate in any particular population. No qualified clinical review.
Inspection history

Clinical review: not reviewed by a qualified clinician.

· New claim added 2026-09-09 from a source located during fresh research on the finasteride-outcomes-28 claim, adding an independent, more recent real-world safety-signal source distinct from the existing hair-outcome trial evidence.

Clinical & experimental findings

Human randomized studyAbstract inspected

Two placebo-controlled trials found that oral finasteride slowed hair loss and improved hair-count measures (+107 hairs at 1 year and +138 at 2 years versus placebo, from a baseline of 876 hairs in the studied scalp area) in men with androgenetic alopecia. These findings do not establish protection from the systemic risks of anabolic-androgenic steroids.[1]

  • Alopecia-specific population and formulation; not a trial of AAS users.
  • Abstract-checked; full paper not confirmed open access as of 2026-09-09. No qualified clinical review.
Inspection history

Clinical review: not reviewed by a qualified clinician.

· Independent source inspection; applicability narrowed and inherited assertions excluded where unsupported. No qualified clinical review.

· Reopened the abstract on 2026-09-09; verified the exact hair-count values and added them to the claim text. A related 2026 systematic review of 5-alpha-reductase-inhibitor sexual side effects in androgenetic alopecia, and a 2026 pharmacovigilance study naming finasteride as a high-risk drug for male infertility, were located and are recorded as separate new claims (general-finasteride-dutasteride-sexual-safety-2026, general-finasteride-infertility-signal-2026) rather than merged into this hair-outcome claim's own scope.

Interaction evidence

Animal / laboratoryAbstract inspected

A rat experiment combining finasteride with nandrolone decanoate reported worse cardiac hypertrophy and cytokine imbalance, but fewer bone-marrow genotoxicity markers, than nandrolone alone; the cardiac and bone-marrow results came from two separate rat cohorts with different dosing schedules (4 weeks versus 3 days), not the same animals. Together with earlier receptor-binding work that tested neither finasteride nor dutasteride, this raises a mechanistic concern; human clinical effects and their magnitude remain unknown.[4][5]

  • Preclinical experiment with intraperitoneal finasteride in n=7/group (cardiac) and n=6/group (bone marrow) rat cohorts; no human pair safety estimate.
  • Opposite effects across organs, and the two organ findings come from different experimental protocols, arguing against a blanket claim that all effects worsen.
Inspection history

Clinical review: not reviewed by a qualified clinician.

· Supporting passages inspected, scope corrected and legacy assertions reassessed; no clinician review performed.

· Independently upgraded the 2020 rat study from abstract to full text on 2026-09-09 (open-access CC BY PDF located after the abstract-only 2026-09-08 pass); confirmed exact group sizes and that the cardiac and bone-marrow findings come from two separate cohorts.

Animal / laboratoryAbstract inspected

Laboratory experiments found reduced androgen-receptor affinity after nandrolone underwent 5-alpha reduction. The 1985 study tested neither finasteride nor dutasteride and did not establish human hair-loss or prostate outcomes; an interaction inferred from that study is mechanistic.[5]

  • Rat and cell experiments cannot quantify clinical benefit or harm for either named pair.
Inspection history

Clinical review: not reviewed by a qualified clinician.

· Supporting passages inspected, scope corrected and legacy assertions reassessed; no clinician review performed.

· Independently reopened every cited source afresh on 2026-09-09 (interaction batch, fresh deep-research pass); disposition and wording reconfirmed against the live sources, not carried over from the prior pass. No qualified clinical review.

What remains unresolved

Editorial assessment

These notes describe the scope of this review. Linked PMIDs are audit identifiers; an identifier alone does not verify a claim.

Narrowly supported passages published with study/product limits; remaining inherited assertions withheld from established-fact displays.

  • Not a comprehensive systematic review. Original monograph topics beyond the individual published claims—including monitoring schedules, contraindication lists, recovery assurances and detailed mechanisms—remain unverified.
  • No qualified clinician has reviewed these claims. Long-term outcomes and all marketed formulations have not been fully assessed.

This reference does not supply a dosing plan, monitoring timetable or recovery regimen. Discuss personal symptoms, medicines and laboratory results with a qualified clinician.

Explore the interaction evidence for this compound →

References

  1. Finasteride in the treatment of men with androgenetic alopecia. Finasteride Male Pattern Hair Loss Study Group.

    1998-10. PMID:9777765 · DOI:10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70007-6 Abstract only.

    Inspected location: PubMed abstract: full Results (baseline hair count 876 per 1-inch/5.1 cm2 circular vertex area; +107 hairs at 1 year and +138 at 2 years vs placebo, P<.001 all comparisons; placebo arm showed progressive hair loss) and Methods (1553 men, two 1-year trials plus blinded extensions, 1215 continued to year 2)

    Study context and inspection record
  2. Sexual dysfunction associated with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review.

    Zlotowska A, Jastrzab-Miskiewicz B, Krajewski PK. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026;13:1787706. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1787706. 2026-06-18. PMID:42396141 · PMCID:PMC13322902 · DOI:10.3389/fmed.2026.1787706 Abstract only.

    Inspected location: Abstract (full text): PRISMA-guided search of MEDLINE/Scopus/Web of Science/Google Scholar through December 2025; 41 studies synthesized (33 primary AGA/MPHL/FPHL-population studies, 8 supporting-evidence studies); oral finasteride 1 mg sexual adverse events 1.9-6.7% vs 0.9-3.9% placebo; topical finasteride 0.25% 2.8% vs oral finasteride 4.8%; dutasteride 0.5 mg 4.1-12.0% vs 4.0-5.0% placebo; conclusion that reported sexual side effects are infrequent, mild and mostly reversible but individual susceptibility varies

    Study context and inspection record
  3. Drug-induced male infertility: a real-world study using FAERS and EudraVigilance databases.

    Gong Z, He J, Feng Q, Liu D, Liu S. Front Pharmacol. 2026;17:1765071. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1765071. 2026-01-29. PMID:41693779 · PMCID:PMC12894360 · DOI:10.3389/fphar.2026.1765071 Abstract only.

    Inspected location: Abstract (full text): FAERS (Q1 2004-Q2 2025) and EudraVigilance (Jan 2002-Oct 2025) disproportionality analysis (ROR, PRR, IC, EBGM) of male reproductive-toxicity adverse-event reports; 1,955 FAERS and 1,384 EudraVigilance cases; 19 cross-validated high-risk drugs including finasteride, dutasteride and testosterone; "Finasteride satisfied both dechallenge and rechallenge criteria, providing strong evidence for causality"

    Study context and inspection record
  4. Finasteride promotes worsening of the cardiac deleterious effects of nandrolone decanoate and protects against genotoxic and cytotoxic damage

    2020-12-09. DOI:10.1590/s2175-97902019000318289 Full text inspected.

    Inspected location: Methods: cardiac-hypertrophy cohort (n=7/group; CONT, DECA 20 mg/kg/week i.m., DECAF +finasteride 100 mcg/kg i.p.; 4 weeks) and a separate micronucleus cohort (n=6/group including a cyclophosphamide positive control; acute 3-day protocol); Results Figures 1-2 (hypertrophy, TNF-alpha/IL-10), Figure 3 (ACE activity), Table I (bone-marrow NCE/PCE/MNPCE/mitotic index); Discussion

    Study context and inspection record
  5. Comparison of the receptor binding properties of nandrolone and testosterone under in vitro and in vivo conditions

    1985-06. PMID:4021486 Abstract only.

    Inspected location: PubMed abstract; publication types and CommentsCorrections in NLM EFetch XML

    Study context and inspection record

Source inspection and clinical review are separate. An abstract check is not a full-text review. The records above identify what was actually inspected and do not certify the complete literature.

Recorded verification attempts
  • Fresh PubMed EUtils retrieval for inherited lead PMID 9777765; identity, abstract and linked corrections checked where an abstract existed.
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9777765/ — abstract; PubMed abstract: Methods: alopecia trials; Results: hair counts and investigator/patient assessments

View this compound in the research library →

Related records in this class

Grouped under Ancillary compounds for navigation only. Shared class membership does not make findings, formulations or evidence interchangeable between records.

StackItSmart

Age confirmation

This reference discusses steroids, SARMs and other compounds. It is educational, not medical advice, and does not recommend using or combining them.

Your confirmation is saved in this browser when storage is available.